Does the Braden scale predict more than pressure injury risk in older inpatients?
- Research Opportunity
- Number of Honour Places Available
- Medicine and Radiology
- Royal Melbourne Hospital
|Dr Rebecca Iseliemail@example.com||0383872000|
|Prof Andrea Maierfirstname.lastname@example.org||+61393422635||Personal web page|
Summary The Braden scale is a commonly used assessment tool to predict risk of pressure injury (PI) in hospitalised patients, and there is emerging evidence that it may also predict morbidity and mortality. This study will examine the predictive value of the Braden scale for PI, functional outcomes and mortality in a cohort of older hospitalised adults.
Pressure injuries (PI), defined as ‘localised damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device’, are a common problem in hospital inpatients, with reported Australian prevalence rates ranging from 3% to 11%. Pressure injuries are often painful and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Risk assessment tools such as the Braden scale are commonly used in clinical practice to identify patients at increased risk of PI incidence. The Braden scale has also been shown to predict mortality and disability in cardiac failure and liver transplant cohorts [5-7].
The aims of this study are to:
- Determine the prevalence of pressure injuries among inpatients of Geriatric Evaluation and Management (GEM) units
- Describe the predictive value of Braden scale in this cohort
- Examine the association between Braden scale and functional performance (gait speed, muscle mass, muscle strength, balance); functional status (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and Katz Activities of Daily Living); discharge destination (community or aged care facility); and, mortality
The study is part of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment study underway at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, a prospective study of patients admitted to GEM units.
- Edsberg, L.E., et al., Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System: Revised Pressure Injury Staging System. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2016. 43 (6): p. 585-597.
- Coyer, F., et al., Pressure injury prevalence in intensive care versus non-intensive care patients: A state-wide comparison. Aust Crit Care, 2017. 30 (5): p. 244-250.
- Wang, H., et al., Impact of pressure ulcers on outcomes in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2014. 93 (3): p. 207-16.
- Young, J., et al., Risk factors associated with pressure ulcer development at a major western Australian teaching hospital from 1998 to 2000: secondary data analysis. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2002. 29 (5): p. 234-41.
- Sundaram, V., et al., The Braden Scale, A standard tool for assessing pressure ulcer risk, predicts early outcomes after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl, 2017. 23 (9): p. 1153-1160.
- Valiani, V., et al., Prognostic Value of Braden Activity Subscale for Mobility Status in Hospitalized Older Adults. J Hosp Med, 2017. 12 (6): p. 396-401.
- Bandle, B., et al., Can Braden Score Predict Outcomes for Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients? J Am Geriatr Soc, 2017. 65 (6): p. 1328-1332.
School Research Themes
Students who are interested in joining this project will need to consider their elegibility as well as other requirements before contacting the supervisor of this research
For further information about this research, please contact a supervisor.
Research Group / Unit / Centre
Research NodeRoyal Melbourne Hospital
MDHS Research library
Explore by researcher, school, project or topic.